Significance of Jobs Plot in
Cyclodextrin Complexation
Amber Vyas1,
Bina Gidwani2, Atul Tripathi1, Preeti Dhurve1*
1University Institute of Pharmacy, Pt. Ravishankar
Shukla University, Raipur
2Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Pharmacy, Kumhari,
Durg
*Corresponding Author E-mail: preeti.dhurve90@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Jobs plot or
continuous variation method is used to estimate the stoichiometry in
cyclodextrin complexation. Cyclodextrin complexation is well known as widely
acceptable technique for improving the poor physic-chemical properties of BCS
class II and class IV drugs. The stoichiometry of the inclusion complex is
given by the number of guest and host molecules present in the supramolecular
complex/inclusion system. The most common stoichiometry is 1:1, implying the
inclusion of a single guest molecule. Now-a-days jobs plot is replaced by
phase-solubility study. Jobs plot deals with spectral methods mainly for
molecular modelling study of drugs and bioactives.
KEYWORDS: cyclodextrin, complexation, jobs plot, phase
solubility study
INTRODUCTION:
In cyclodextrin
complexation jobs plot is used for determination of the Stoichiometry for
preparation of binary/ternary complex. The theoretical aspect of cyclodextrin
complexation contributes in understanding the molecular recognition, molecular
interactions and the role of different structural factors of the guest
molecule.
The
stoichiometry plays a vital role in complexation. Without stoichiometric ratio
of guest and host; it would be difficult to prepare complex. According to
literatures and datas, it is stated and considered that both on experimental
grounds and molecular dynamics calculations the efficient stoichiometry for
complexation is 1:2 guest: host, providing best effect. Stoichiometry can be
estimated by spectral method. Through stoichiometry and or phase solubility
study following parameters relevant to complexation can be determined –
a. Stability constant
b. Complexation efficiency
c. Coefficient of regression
d. Intrinsic solubility of guest
e. Solubilizing efficiency
The stoichiometry/stoichiometric ratio
The
stoichiometry of the inclusion complex is given by the number of guest [G] and
host [H] molecules present in the supramolecular complex/inclusion system. The
general notation being GnHm; The most common stoichiometry is 1:1 (G:H),
implying the inclusion of a single guest molecule. However, several other
stoichiometries like G1H2, G2H1, G2H2, G1H3, G3H1, etc., can also be encountered.
Besides 1:1 stiochiometry, the formation of the G1H2 complex may be due to two
successive equilibriums, the simultaneous presence of 1:1 and 1:2 complexes is
also frequently mentioned.
JOBs Method
The first method
used for determination of the stoichiometry of inclusion complexes was Job’s
method given by Mr. Job in year 1928. It is also known as the continuous
variation method. In this method, the stock solutions of
equimolecular concentrations of Host and Guest are used for the study. The
samples are prepared by mixing different volumes of these two solutions in such
a way that the total concentration [H]+[G] remains constant and the molar
fraction of the guest, XG varies in the range 0 –1. Graph is plotted between
the variation of the experimental property measured ΔP, in presence of the
host in respect with the value for the free guest and XG or XH.
The value of XG
for which the plot presents the maximum deviation gives the value of
stoichiometry of supramolecular system/the inclusion complex. In general; XG =
0.5 for 1:1 or 2:2 G:H complexes; XH = 0.33 for 1:2 G:H complexes). In most of
the cases, in a Job plot ΔP represents the change in absorbance (by UV) of
the guest during addition of the host, ΔA. Also, other properties
correlated with the concentration of the complex can be the change in chemical
shifts (Δδ) (by NMR) or the enthalpy changes (ΔH).
Job’s method was
described by Landy for the determination of the stoichiometry of CD inclusion
complexes and named it as Competitive Continuous Variation Plot. This approach
represented a coupling of Job’s method with the competitive experiments,
spectral displacements, well known in the study of biopolymer– ligand
interactions. The basic aim was to monitor the changes of a given experimental
property and to build a Job plot when a competitor ligand, for which the
features of the inclusion complex were previously determined, is introduced in
the system. This method is recommended or suitable for those cases in which
either the low solubility prevents the usual experimental determinations or the
spectral properties of the guest are not in the experimental accessible range.
The linear and non-linear mathematical models and equations for stoichiometry
of inclusion complexes are discussed in table 1.
Table 1 –
Equation based on stoichiometry of inclusion complex
Stoichiometric ratio |
Equation |
||||
1:1 |
|
|
GH |
|
|
1:2 |
|
|
GH2 |
|
|
2:1 |
G + H |
|
GH, GH +
G |
|
G2H |
2:2 |
G + H |
|
GH, GH+ GH G2H2 |
|
G2H2 |
1:1 + 1:2 |
G + H |
|
GH, GH + H |
|
GH2 |
In certain
cases, where complexes with different stoichiometry, are present in the system,
the necessity to introduce several fitting parameters reduces the reliability
of the fits. In that case, it is better to work with sets of data read at
different wavelengths and to perform a multivariable analysis of the whole set
of data, imposing the condition that the association constants are the same,
independent on the wavelength. An ideal jobs plot is shown in figure 1.
Binary cyclodextrin complex
system
When the inclusion complex is prepared by mixing only
two components i.e. drug and cyclodextrin, the system is called as the binary
inclusion system.
Ternary cyclodextrin complex
system
This type of
complexation is also known as multicomponent complexation (MCC). When the
inclusion complex is prepared by mixing more than two components i.e. the
complexation involves use of third component called excipient eg: surfactant,
emulsifier, polymer etc along with the drug and cyclodextrin, the system is
called as the ternary inclusion system.
Figure 1 - A typical jobs plot
Earlier, jobs
plot was widely used for its applications in pharmacology, biomedicine,
pharmaceutics, microbiology, forensic science and allied fields. Some of the
contributions are discussed as ---
Iacovina et. al;
in year 2012 prepared jobs plot for investigating the complexation between
Hydroxymethyl ferrocene and β-Cyclodextrin. In solid state XRD and FT IR were used for
the study and for solution state - solubility studies, NMR and UV-Vis
spectroscopy were used. The 1:1 stoichiometry of the complex is confirmed by
the continuous variation method with R =
0.5.
Similarly, Yanez
et al, in 2012 improved the physicochemical property of herbicide bentazon
through complexation with cyclodextrin. The stoichiometry was 1:1 with jobs
plot and phase solubility study. Pipemidic acid, a therapeutic agent used in
urinary tract infection was complexed with cyclodextrin for the enhancement of
solubility, bioavailability and pharmacological activity. The 1:1 stoichiometry
was established by a Job plot and the inclusion mechanism was clarified using
docking experiments (Iacovino, 2013). Mostly herbals and phytoconstituents were
studied through jobs plot.
Recently, the
use of jobs plot is replaced by phase solubility study. Now-a-days very less
emphasis is focused on jobs plot for determination of stoichiometry.
Phase solubility study
The method
resembles the jobs plot or continuous variation method. Through phase
solubility study, type of solubility curve indicates the relationship between
host and guest.
Phase solubility/equilibrium solubility study is the
analysis or investigation of dependence of guest solubility on the
concentration of host [CD], and may reveal both the stoichiometry of the
complex formation as well as the stability constant of the complex. The
solubility of guest molecules is often determined by UV spectrophotometry, as
CDs do not absorb in the UV spectrum. Phase-solubility of drug/CD complexes
comprises two processes. The experimental techniques for phase-solubility
analysis involve multiple vials of equal masses of substrate (compound of
interest) and solvent, with increasing amounts of the ligand (complexing
agent), mixing a constant temperature and pressure. This is maintained until
equilibrium in reached. As complexation lowers the thermodynamic activity of
the dissolved drug, more drugs dissolves until the activity of the free drug,
which is in chemical equilibrium with the complex, becomes equal to the
thermodynamic activity of the pure solid drug. The interpretation of the
resultant equilibrium plots according to the phase rule results in the
determination of the stability constant of the complex.
Phase-solubility diagrams are generated by plotting
the total molar concentration of the substrate against the molar concentration
of the ligand. The diagrams obtained fall into two main categories, Type A and
Type B. Type A diagrams are characterized by a continual increase in substrate
concentration [S] with increasing ligand concentration [L], presumably due to
the formation of soluble complexes between the substrate and the ligand. A strict
linear rise in substrate concentration with increasing ligand concentration,
designated AL, occurs when complexes are of the first order in Ligand (shown in
figure 2). The linear relationship between solubility and CD concentration has
a number of advantages, one of which is the lack of precipitation of the
formulation upon dilution.
Positive curvature, type AP, arises when the complexes
contain the ligand at higher orders than 1. Negative curvature, type AN, may
arise when the presence of the ligand at high concentrations changes the
stability constant of the complex or induces self-association of the ligand.
This behavior is rare. The plateau may also represent saturation of the
solution with ligand, owing to its own solubility limits.
Type B phase-solubility diagrams arise when complexes
of limited solubility are formed between the substrate and the Ligand. The
limited solubility of the natural CDs often gives rise to type B phase diagrams
when complexed with other compounds with limited aqueous solubility. Type BS
diagrams indicate some solubility of the complex.
Figure 2 – Phase solubility diagram
Through this
phase solubility study –
Stoichiometry
can be determined or estimated
Stability
constant [K]
Complexation
efficiency
Solubilizing
Efficiency can be determined as the Ratio between drug solubility in aqueous
solution of CD and in water.
Cyclodextrin complexation is mainly
suitable for drugs, molecules, compounds of BCS class II and class IV. Not all
the drugs and molecules can be complexed with cyclodextrin. The minimum
criteria for complexation are –
Ø
More than five atoms (C,
P, S, N) form the skeleton of the drug molecule.
Ø
Melting point temperature
of the substance is below 250 0C.
Ø
Solubility in water is
less than 10 mg/mL.
Ø
The guest molecule
consists of less than five condensed rings.
Ø
Molecular weight between
100 and 400.
CONCLUSION:
In this article an attempt has been made to
discuss and explore the concept of jobs plot or continuous variation method for
determination of the Stoichiometry of cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. This
can be done mainly by using spectral methods like UV, FTIR, NMR, circular
diochrism etc. Both continuous variation
and phase solubilty are used to estimate the stoichiometry. This is applicable
for drugs with poor biopharmaceutical and physic-chemical properties.
REFERENCES:
1.
Tablet
C. The Determination of the Stoichiometry of Cyclodextrin Inclusion complexes
by Spectral Methods: Possibilities and Limitations. Stoichiometry and Research
– The Importance of Quantity in Biomedicine. www.intechopen.com
2.
Ficarra,
R., Ficarra, P., Di Bella, M.R., Raneri, D., Tommasini, S., Calabro, M.L.,
Gamberini, M.C. and Rustichelli, C. Study of β-blockers:-cyclodextrins inclusion
complex by NMR, DSC, X-ray and SEM investigation. Journal of Pharmaceutical and
Biomedical Analysis. 2000; 23 (1): 33-40.
3.
Li, J.
and Loh, X.J. Cyclodextrin-based supramolecular architectures: Syntheses,
structures, and applications for drug and gene delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery
Reviews. 2008; 60 (9): 1000-1017.
4.
Martin
Del Valle, E.M. Cyclodextrins and their uses: a review. Process Biochemistry.
2004; 39 (9): 1033-1046.
5.
Connors,
K. A. Binding Constants: The Measurement of Molecular Complex Stability; John
Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 1987.
6.
Iacovino
R. β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex to Improve Physicochemical Properties
of Pipemidic Acid: Characterization and Bioactivity Evaluation. Int. J. Mol.
Sci. 2013; 14: 13022-13041.
7.
Yanez
C. Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex to Improve Physicochemical Properties of
Herbicide Bentazon: Exploring Better Formulations. PLOs One. 2012; 7 (8):
e41072.
8.
Iacovino
R. Physicochemical Characterization and Cytotoxic Activity Evaluation of
Hydroxymethylferrocene: β-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex. Molecules. 2012;
17: 6056-6070.
9. Challa R, Ahuja A, Ali J, Khar R.
Cyclodextrins in drug delivery: an updated review. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2005; 6: 329–357.
10. Connors
KA. The stability of cyclodextrin complexes in solution. Chemical Reviews.
1997; 97: 1325–57.
11.
Harada P. Preparation and structures of supramolecules between
cyclodextrins and polymers. Coord. Chem. Reviews. 1996; 148: 115—133.
12. Higuchi T, Connors KA. Phase-solubility techniques.
In: Reilly CN, editor. Advances in analytical chemistry and instrumentation.
pp. 117–212. Wiley, New York (1965).
Received on 18.05.2016 Modified on 02.06.2016
Accepted on 28.06.2016 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J.
Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(7):1013-1016.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00191.8